Website Data in Table Widget
I have a number of websites that are being monitored. I would like to create a dashboard with a table of response times from the Washington LogicMonitor site. However the Table widget does not have an option to include Website data - only resources which seem to exclude data from Website monitoring. I can add graphs and alerts of website data but cant seem to find a way to access the raw website polling data in the Table widget. Is this a known limitation?
Why are websites missing so many features and treated differently than computers?
Every time I try to do something with websites I just get angry. I can't change settings at the group level like I can with resources. Can't easily change thresholds or anything. The Info tab is blank so I can't see any detail about a website. If I try to use the API, the formatting is all different so I can't get any tree/group information to filter results. Everything just sucks about how websites are different than resources. Why is this? Is there any way to pull a list of all the websites under s certain folder in the tree? I can't find any way to do that. I can't even pull a list of all and then filter by a Group field because it only shows the immediate group and nothing about the higher level groups it's in. I need to check all the sites under a particular top level folder, to make sure the alerting is the same. There appear to be absolutely no way to do this without manually going to each sites and checking it by hand. Thanks.
Templates for Web Checks
One feature that makes LogicMonitor so powerful is the combination of Auto Discovery and the AppliesTo feature on Logic Modules. Except that this is entirely missing for Web Checks. Several of our products are web-based. We need to monitor many instances of these products across many client environments. We would like to be able to define a Web Check “template” that uses variables in pre-defined Steps, which can be cloned/deployed for each client. Even better… I’d like to specify an FQDN or base url, and have LogicMonitor perform Auto Discovery to decide which Web Check is appropriate for this instanceCan a website check look for multiple occurrences of a JSON item?
Hi, Normally I have a website that looks through JSON and picks out a pair like Status = Complete. However, I now have a JSON result that includes multiple statuses in one file. I need to be able to parse through all the occurrences of “state” and verify that all of them are either “running” or “completed”. Is there any way to do this through the LM gui? I was told I might have to use a Groovy script, but I don’t know what that is or how it works (not a programmer). If anyone can guide me towards a solution for this, that’d be great. Thanks!v3 Python SDK outdated?
Hello, I’m trying to use the Python SDK to add websites for monitoring. For my current use case, the primary reason for this is to gain some alerting on our SSL expiry times. Using the SDK has been a generally frustrating experience all around so far, however I’ve noticed that the v3 API is returning fields which aren’t supported or documented by the SDK or API docs. Specifically, for the Website endpoints (GET/POST/PUT), the top-level fields `schema`, `trigger_ssl_expiration_alert` and `trigger_ssl_status_alert` are all unsupported in the 3.0.172 SDK. Unfortunately these also all sound like the fields I need to be setting in order to get SSL monitoring set up. It also appears that the top-level `schema` field is required to enable HTTPS monitoring, as the `schema` field in the `steps` is ignored. I can see that this top-levle field is set to https when toggling the schema in the web UI, when using dev tools to inspect the request. I’ve already done a fair bit of work using the SDK, so I’d hate to have to rip it out at this point and start building all my requests manually in order to support this. I’m using logicmonitor_sdk 3.0.172 at present, which is the latest available release via Pip and tarball. I can see that these fields have been added on the master branch in Github. Is there a timeline for the release of these changes? While I’m here, can I also ask that this functionality is added to your Terraform provider, because that would save me a lot of hours and stress going forward. 😉