Forum Discussion

Mark_Hensler's avatar
Mark_Hensler
9 months ago
Solved

Dynamic Groups for Websites

Why don’t we have Dynamic Groups for Websites?

We have chosen to group our websites in client-specific groups. However, there are times when we are performing maintenance across a product which impacts multiple clients. We would love to have the ability to schedule downtime across multiple clients using a Dynamic Group.

Summer Launch
website
  • palleman's avatar
    palleman
    8 months ago

    Yes, the intent is still to bring websites into parity in terms of functionality with resources. Along with dynamic groups and inherited thresholds, the goal is also to be able to add Websites to Services and Dashboards. 

4 Replies

Sort By
  • Stuart_Weenig's avatar
    Stuart_Weenig
    Icon for Legend rankLegend
    9 months ago

    Follow up question, is the goal still to move websites into the resources page, thus making dynamic groups and inherited thresholds a thing?

  • palleman's avatar
    palleman
    8 months ago

    Yes, the intent is still to bring websites into parity in terms of functionality with resources. Along with dynamic groups and inherited thresholds, the goal is also to be able to add Websites to Services and Dashboards. 

  • Joe_Williams's avatar
    Joe_Williams
    Icon for Expert rankExpert
    8 months ago

    Yes, the intent is still to bring websites into parity in terms of functionality with resources. Along with dynamic groups and inherited thresholds, the goal is also to be able to add Websites to Services and Dashboards. 

    Is there a timeline on this? I was told this was due “Q1 next year” probably 4 years ago.

  • Stuart_Weenig's avatar
    Stuart_Weenig
    Icon for Legend rankLegend
    8 months ago

    Yes, the intent is still to bring websites into parity in terms of functionality with resources. Along with dynamic groups and inherited thresholds, the goal is also to be able to add Websites to Services and Dashboards. 

    Is there a timeline on this? I was told this was due “Q1 next year” probably 4 years ago.

    Modus operandi.