Dependencies or Parent/Child Relationships

Definitely a step in the right direction for LM..  now we just need to be able to use this for stuff that goes down but doesn't have an SDT lol... I assume the same logic can be applied but that involves deeper changes than data sources :)/emoticons/smile@2x.png 2x" title=":)" width="20">

I may have missed it but if it hasn't been requested, besides host dependencies, we should have service dependencies. There should also be multiple dependencies.

* Host 03 depends on Host01
* Host 04 depends on Host01 AND/OR Host02
  -- (and) don't alert Host04(and services) if Host01 and/or Host02 are down.
  -- ( or) don't alert on Host04 if just Host01 or Host02 are down.
* Service07 depends on Service05
* Service10 depends on Service05
* Service08 depends on Service01 AND/OR Service02
  -- (and) don't alert on service 08 if Serviec01 and/or Service02 are down.
  -- ( or) don't alert on service08 if just Service01 or Service02 are down.

and the list could go on with multiple scenarios...

* Service09 depends on Host 01
* Service12 depends on Host 01 AND/OR Host02
* Host03 depends on Serivce04
* Host03 depends on Service02 AND/OR Service06