Professor
EmployeeHi Lewis,
Thanks so much for raising this. We hear you. The change to require scheduling for reports for data over 30 days old was made to ensure that larger, more complex reports always deliver complete and reliable results. While ad-hoc reports are great for recent data, we found that scheduled reports are the best way to handle bigger timeframes consistently.
We know this adds an extra step, and we are actively exploring ways to bring back more flexibility for quick, one-off historical checks. Your idea about allowing a limited number of ad-hoc reports for older data is a great suggestion, and I’ve shared it with our engineering team.
In the meantime, one tip other users have found helpful is creating a “template” scheduled report you can quickly duplicate and adjust for different date ranges.
We really appreciate your feedback, it helps us keep making the platform better.
- Ian
