2 hours ago, Austin Culbertson said:Anyone who argues that this type of monitoring constitutes 'wide-reaching application monitoring solution' really doesn't have an understanding as to what 'application monitoring' actually means, and I, too, would strongly question their motivation for making such an argument.
It's a money grab. LM APM is a different license bucket with different costs. They're trying to draw the line between infrastructure monitoring and application monitoring. I'm curious (DM me) about your thoughts because I had thought that individual process monitoring should be done on a deeper level, a la APM. Some of it is LM's origins as a device monitoring system. Multi-instance was probably only thought of for cases of interfaces, drives, etc., not something that can be as ephemeral as processes.
