Palo Alto Improvements

OK, thanks.  These all were shared here, so not sure why the became private.  Will check...

14 hours ago, Michael Rodrigues said:

We switched everything to "Private" unless it was shared on this forum, out of an abundance of caution.

We'll be talking about the new Exchange features in a href="https://communities.logicmonitor.com/topic/5865-youre-invited-10-june-2020-lm-exchange/" rel="">today's webinar. One of the things we can discuss in the Q&A is the public/private status of community submitted modules.

a href="https://communities.logicmonitor.com/topic/5873-public-vs-private-modules-and-the-new-exchange" rel="">The conversation about modules that used to be public that are now private is continued here.

The author needs to verify that the module has been published to the public repository. In simple cases, it's automatically made public at that point. If there is code in the module, it will undergo manual security review by the LM staff before it is made publicly available.

20 minutes ago, Stuart Weenig said:

The author needs to verify that the module has been published to the public repository. In simple cases, it's automatically made public at that point. If there is code in the module, it will undergo manual security review by the LM staff before it is made publicly available.

Almost certainly there is code as Palo Alto checks virtually always require API access.  Review has seemed in most cases I have been involved with to be a mostly ad hoc process (or if not, definitely opaque). I suggested in one of our UI/UX meetings that there be a "Request Review" button or similar to create or escalate a request for security review.  As a bonus, use a ticketing system (this would be welcome for feedback as well, which as I understand generates internal-only tickets).  A unified customer visible ticket system for feedback and module review would be very helpful.

I’m interested in EMXWRR, but I don’t see that in the Exchange though I do see the other three mentioned above (KFWLJ9, 3YJJCZ, and DXEAP4).  Any chance that’s available somewhere I’m missing?

@mnagel, any chance you could switch that to public? 

Thank you!  I see it now, this is great.