Community Blog
Explore thought-provoking blog posts, share your insights, and earn badges along the way. Every read and comment helps shape a richer community experience. Join us for themed writing challenges, featured posts, and collaborative content series.
Overview Alert governance keeps your alerting program effective over time by giving teams a clear way to review, refine, and own the alerts they depend on. The strongest alerting programs are not just well configured at launch; they are maintained through ownership, review cycles, threshold hygiene, and continuous improvement.ย Key Principles Alert quality is a lifecycle, not a one-time project Ownership should be explicit at both the service and routing layers Overrides need visibility and cleanup Review cadence matters more than reactive tuning alone Historical alert data should drive change decisions Alert Governance Features and Methods Ownership and review Internal enablement content frames tuning as an ongoing discipline supported by reports, dashboards, and recurring investigation of noisy or redundant conditions. That is exactly the right foundation for governance. A mature alerting program should define who owns thresholds, who owns routing, and who reviews drift over time. Threshold hygiene The Alert Thresholds report is especially useful for alert governance because it shows what global defaults have been overridden. Operational visibility The Alerts page supports saved views, custom columns, filtered investigations, and historical alert review. Those features are not just helpful in the moment. They also make it easier for teams to create repeatable review workflows by service, team, severity, or alert type.ย Routing hygiene Governance also applies to routing. Alert rules that once made sense can become stale as environments evolve. Since rule processing is first match and rule order matters, even a small drift in priority or matching logic can change where alerts land. Reviewing the rule stack is part of governance, not just routing setup. Best Practices Create Ownership at Two Levels Define who owns the monitored service itself. Define who owns the alert path, including thresholds, routing, and escalation behavior. Recognize that service ownership and alert ownership may not always belong to the same team. Make ownership explicit, so alert quality does not become a shared responsibility with no actual owner. Review Overrides on a Schedule Use the Alert Thresholds report to review custom thresholds on a recurring basis. Identify where alerting has been disabled or heavily customized deeper in the hierarchy. Look for drift that may no longer reflect current operational needs. Treat override review as routine maintenance, not just a cleanup project. Use History to Drive Change Review alert volume and recurring patterns before changing thresholds or routing. Use trend data to identify noisy resources and repeat offenders. Base tuning decisions on actual alert behavior, not anecdotal feedback alone. Let historical signal quality guide improvement work. Keep Review Lightweight but Real Establish a practical review cadence that teams can sustain. Consider a monthly threshold review for noisy conditions and overrides. Use quarterly rule reviews to catch stale routing logic and priority drift. Add post-incident tuning reviews when major events expose alerting gaps. Implementation Checklist โ Assign clear owners for thresholds, routing, and service-level alert quality โ Create saved views for recurring review workflows โ Run the Alert Thresholds report regularly to identify drift โ Review alert trends for noisy resources or recurring patterns โ Audit alert rules for priority order and stale matching logic โ Review escalation chains when support coverage or team structure changes โ Capture major tuning decisions so future reviewers understand why they were made Conclusion Alert governance is what keeps alerts from slowly degrading as environments change. When ownership is clear, reports are used consistently, and tuning decisions are revisited over time, alerting stays relevant, trusted, and operationally useful. Additional Resources Alerts Thresholds Report Alert Trends Report Choosing a Report Type Managing Alerts from the Alerts Page Alert Rules Escalation Chains
This Product Power Hour gave the community a practical look at how Internet Performance Monitoring, or IPM, is evolving . The session focused on how teams can improve visibility across the full internet stack, from network paths and employee endpoints to customer-facing digital experiences. The call centered on three core IPM lenses: network experience, workforce experience, and customer experience . Attendees saw how synthetic monitoring, real user monitoring, endpoint monitoring, Internet Sonar, Envision, and Edwin AI can work together to help teams answer critical operational questions faster, such as whether an issue is caused by the application, the network, a SaaS provider, a user device, or a broader internet disruption. Key Highlights โญIPM brings together synthetic monitoring, real user monitoring, and Internet Sonar to provide visibility across websites, APIs, applications, endpoints, SaaS services, cloud providers, CDNs, and network paths. โญIn-session traceroute helps improve network troubleshooting by establishing a TCP connection before sending probes, which can result in cleaner, more complete path visibility compared to traditional traceroute approaches. โญNode-to-node monitoring enables teams to test connectivity across enterprise, cloud, backbone, last mile, and wireless nodes , with visibility into latency, jitter, packet loss, and path health. โญWorkforce Experience Monitoring now includes test-level proxy configuration , allowing teams to define proxy behavior per test instead of managing proxy settings only at the individual enterprise agent level. โญEndpoint call quality monitoring gives IT teams visibility into Zoom and Microsoft Teams experiences , including application score, jitter, packet loss, packet drop, CPU usage, memory utilization, and geographic trends. โญCatchpoint data can be pushed into Envision and correlated in Edwin AI , helping teams connect external experience signals with infrastructure telemetry, identify root cause, and surface suggested remediation steps. Q&A Q: Are shared SmartBoard links dynamic and updated in real time? A: Shared SmartBoard links capture the selected timeframe, so they are static snapshots of the data from that investigation window. However, the shared view is still interactive, meaning users can click through records and explore the captured data. For a live, dynamic view, teams can put these matrixes into a custom dashboard and share that instead. Q: Why do I only see instant tests under Endpoint and not the endpoint features shown in the demo? A: Endpoint is a separate product and requires its own license. If Endpoint is not enabled in your portal, you may only see limited options, such as instant tests. Teams interested in trying Endpoint should reach out to their account executive to discuss access or a POV. Q: Can I add an endpoint to monitor an enterprise Zoom experience throughout the day? A: Yes. With Endpoint enabled, teams can monitor how an endpoint behaves throughout the day, including CPU and memory utilization, what the user accessed, and the quality of their experience while using applications like Zoom. Q: Is Internet Sonar required to drill down on endpoint data? A: No. Endpoint and Internet Sonar are separate products that provide different types of visibility. Endpoint requires an agent to be installed on workforce devices, whereas Internet Sonar provides visibility into broader SaaS and internet service issues without requiring installation. Used together, they can help determine whether an issue is isolated to a user or the workforce, or affects a larger region or service. Q: If call quality issues appear in one location, should I check Internet Sonar to see whether the issue is broader? A: Yes. If call quality issues occur in a specific area, Internet Sonar can help determine whether the issue affects other companies, regions, or services, or is isolated to your own users. Q: What is the best way to monitor end-user experience for custom integrations and microservices? A: A combination of test types is usually needed. For microservices, API monitoring is often the starting point, along with supporting checks such as DNS and network reachability. To get an aggregate view, teams can use custom dashboards and widgets that combine synthetic, endpoint, RUM, and Internet Sonar data. These views can also be pushed into Envision to compare experience data alongside infrastructure data. Q: Are Catchpoint synthetics similar to Selenium synthetics? A: Catchpoint synthetics go beyond traditional Selenium-style transaction testing. The platform breaks monitoring into different protocols and test types, including HTTP checks, full browser tests using Playwright, scripted user flows with Playwright and Puppeteer, API microservice tests, DNS checks, ping, and traceroute. This allows teams to monitor the individual protocols and services that power a user experience. Q: Can the same synthetic tests run from POPs and endpoint agents? A: The full set of synthetic monitors can run from public agents and enterprise agents. Endpoint agents are lighter weight, so they support simpler scheduled tests such as HTTP checks, traceroutes, and pings. They do not run full browser tests because endpoint devices are already running user workloads. Q: When should I use in-session traceroute? A: In-session traceroute is useful when traditional traceroute results show incomplete paths, repeated hops, or packet loss that makes troubleshooting difficult. It helps measure a cleaner path by establishing the connection before probing. Q: Can in-session traceroute be used with enterprise nodes, or is it only for backbone nodes? A: In-session traceroute can be used with any node type, including enterprise nodes and backbone nodes. Q: How do I enable in-session traceroute? A: It is a simple change in the traceroute sub-monitor type. Select in session as the sub-monitor type. Teams can also copy an existing test, run the traditional and in-session versions side by side for a few hours, compare the results, and decide whether to update more tests. Customer Call-outs ๐โThank you so much - It's really helpful.โ ๐โYeah, that's very cool. That's the first time I've seen that [Catchpoint events] done live in there with those, popping that in and using Edwin to pull all that out.โ Whatโs Next ๐ 1H Announcement Webinar Join us for the 1H Announcement webinar, which will serve as the official public presentation of the release themes and product updates previewed during this meeting. This will be the broader launch moment for the autonomous IT story, upcoming innovations, and related release details. May 12 at 12 PM CT ๐ Register here โก Product Power Hour Join the next Product Power Hour sessions to continue exploring product updates, live demos, and practical use cases across the platform. These sessions are built for technical practitioners who want to see what is new, understand how features work in context, and ask questions directly to the teams behind the product. Optimize Cloud Spend with Confidence ๐ May 19 ๐10am CT Automated Remediation for Faster Issue Resolution ๐ June 17 ๐12pm CT ๐ฝ๏ธ User Group Dinner LogicMonitor is continuing to bring customers together through in-person user group dinners and regional sessions. These events are a great way to connect with peers, share monitoring strategies, and discuss real-world operational challenges with other practitioners. Join us in Chicago on May 27th ย Elevate Community Conference LogicMonitorโs annual conference is coming up in October and will bring the broader community together for product updates, technical enablement, customer stories, and peer networking. This is the best opportunity to go deeper on the platform roadmap and learn how other teams are scaling observability across their organizations. Registration opens mid-May Resources and Review ๐ Want to upskill? Earn your Catchpoint badge! ๐ป Review the slide deck here ๐นWatch the recording here or directly on the event page
As LogicMonitor continues to evolve the dashboard experience, UIv3 Dashboards have now been deprecated in favor of the new dashboard experience. Dashboards are a critical part of how teams monitor performance, troubleshoot issues, and share insights across the business. Any change to that experience matters. The good news is that transitioning to the new dashboard experience is more straightforward than many users expect. Existing dashboards remain available, core functionality is still there, and the updated experience introduces meaningful improvements that make dashboards easier to use, manage, and share. To help users get up to speed quickly, weโve put together a short set of videos that walk through the most important updates and show how to make the most of the new dashboard experience. What To Expect From The New Dashboard Experience The transition to the new UI is designed to be as seamless as possible. For most users, the biggest changes are not about rebuilding dashboards from scratch, but about learning a more modern, streamlined way to work. Here are a few practical tips to make the transition easier: Get Familiar With The Updated Layout The overall dashboard structure will still feel familiar, but navigation and actions are now more efficiently organized. Common controls like time range selection, adding widgets, and dashboard actions are easier to access, helping teams move faster in daily workflows. Watch: Navigation and Interface Updates Use Filters To Reduce Dashboard Sprawl One of the biggest improvements in the new dashboard experience is filtering. Instead of maintaining multiple versions of similar dashboards, users can quickly filter by customer, environment, or other criteria, and the full dashboard updates instantly. Saved views make repeat workflows even faster and more consistent across teams. Watch: Dashboard Filters: Improvements and Saved Views Share The Exact View You Want Others To See Collaboration is easier in the new experience. Shared dashboard links can preserve time ranges and applied filters, making it much easier to align teammates, stakeholders, or customers around the same set of data, without extra explanation. Watch: Sharing Dashboards and Enhanced Collaboration Take Advantage Of More Flexible, Query-Driven Analysis The Advanced Metrics widget brings a powerful new way to build dashboards. By using LMQL to define and reuse queries, teams can create more flexible visualizations for troubleshooting, reporting, and customer-specific views, all from the same underlying logic. Watch: Advanced Metrics Widget and Query-Driven Visualization Keep Using The Widgets You Already Know For teams already using Custom Graph, Big Number, and Pie Chart widgets, the good news is that those familiar capabilities remain in place. The main change is a cleaner, more structured configuration experience that makes widget setup and editing easier. Watch: Classic Widgets: Custom Graph, Big Number, and Pie Chart Why This Transition Matters The new dashboard experience is not just a visual refresh. It creates a stronger foundation for faster workflows today and more innovation going forward. With improved filtering, easier sharing, more flexible visualization options, and a more intuitive configuration experience, teams can get more value from dashboards with less effort. The move away from UIv3 Dashboards is an opportunity to simplify dashboard management, improve collaboration, and leverage a more modern experience built for how teams work today. With the right features already in place and guided walkthroughs available for the most important changes, getting comfortable with the new dashboard experience can be quick, practical, and immediately valuable.