Log4J security alert, is there any customers need to do?
Hi, do LogicMonitor customers need to do anything regarding the Log4J potential vulnerability? (CVE-2021-44228)
https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/alert-cve-2021-44228.html
Mosh
Posted 4 years ago·Last reply 4 years ago
7 comments
LM User
·4 years agoI believe Log4j was included but not actively used. As I understand it, the next version of collector which should be pushed out soon will not even have log4j present.
Mosh
OP4 years ago@Stuart WeenigThanks.
Although the 2.15 can mitigate, for complete mitigation version 2.16.0 should be used, as this version completely removes the feature. Ideally the class "jndilookup.class" should be removed altogether.
https://logging.apache.org/log4j/2.x/security.html#Fixed_in_Log4j_2.15.0
"It was found that the fix to address CVE-2021-44228 in Apache Log4j 2.15.0 was incomplete in certain non-default configurations. This could allows attackers with control over Thread Context Map (MDC) input data when the logging configuration uses a non-default Pattern Layout with either a Context Lookup (for example, $${ctx:loginId}) or a Thread Context Map pattern (%X, %mdc, or %MDC) to craft malicious input data using a JNDI Lookup pattern resulting in a denial of service (DOS) attack. Log4j 2.15.0 restricts JNDI LDAP lookups to localhost by default. Note that previous mitigations involving configuration such as to set the system property log4j2.noFormatMsgLookup to true do NOT mitigate this specific vulnerability."
LM User
·4 years agohttps://www.logicmonitor.com/support/log4shell-security-vulnerability-cve-2021-44228
LM User
·4 years agoI'm told that public communications will be posted on our support website later this week.
LM User
·4 years agoI don't think there's one yet, but it wouldn't surprise me if a blog post came out today. I'll inquire.
Mosh
OP4 years agoThanks @Stuart Weenig. Is there is a more public facing notice? As an enterprise out customers are asking us if we are exposed and we need to demonstrate we are not by including links to statements from our vendors.
LM User
·4 years agoThe following message should have been presented to administrators logging in after Saturday: