Radical Suggestion for Web Sites
Rather than have Websites as separate section in the product with a separate hierarchy to manage; how about making all of the Websites stuff part of the Device Tree and rename the Devices section to something that covers both. Then if I want to add a website or service check I simply do it against the "group". This way I wouldn't have to maintain two hierarchies of business services.
What do other folks think of this?
Mosh
Posted 7 years ago·Last reply 7 years ago
6 comments
Joe_Tran
·7 years agoSo they already renamed Devices to Resources. I can only hope this feature request is on the horizon ?. Totally not wishful thinking, right? ?
Ryan_A_
·7 years agoFourthed! :)/emoticons/smile@2x.png 2x" title=":)" width="20"> It would make my life easier as well.
Joe_Tran
·7 years agoThirded :)/emoticons/smile@2x.png 2x" title=":)" width="20">
Matt_Gauthier
·7 years agoSeconded - this is a great idea.
Mosh
OP7 years agoAwesome. Good to hear @Forrest Evans - LM
Forrest_Evans_-
·7 years agoHi Mosh,
Not quite as radical as you think!! We've considered this in the past and the workflow and UI/UX benefits are definitely there. We are working on 2019 roadmap planning and it's on the list to be discussed.
~Forrest